Who is
and threats
of the case

Juridical situation >>> Setup at the Romanian border point Nadlac

On the 28 th of March, following some ambiguous news about an interdiction to leave the country, Mr. Gregorian Bivolaru went to Nadlac border point to check whether he was confined to the border or not. Mr. Bivolaru considered this check necessary since several radio stations had already stated “ Bivolaru is confined to the border ”, although the interdiction was meant for Gabriel Bivolaru, former deputy of the PSD (Social Democratic Party - ruling party at that date) who had been sentenced in absence to 5 years' imprisonment for bank fraud.

The reason for the journey to Nadlac was a planned trip to Hungary . Thus, in order to avoid a possible situation leading to the conclusion that he intended to escape the prosecution, Bivolaru and a yoga practitioner friend, Farkas Ferenc Zsolt, tried to get information on his possible interdiction to leave the country from an acquaintance of the latter, a customs officer at the Nadlac customs.


Below we quote from the P.S.D. – Social-Democrat Party – transcripts of the meeting of March 27 . These fragments refer to citizen Gregorian Bivolaru, not a member of the party, however his case is reported by the Internal Affairs Minister at that time, Ioan Rus, to prime-minister Adrian Nastase, during a meeting of the permanent delegation of the party.

Ioan Rus “…And the other Bivolaru (Gregorian e.n.) is close to a conviction. There is already enough evidence to incriminate him.”

Adrian Nastase “I understand that it is sex instead of bread. Some people like Basescu for instance, offer the circus, other people offer sex to the people, others…”

Mr.…. “The police is trying to get them out now.”

Overlooking the frustration of the former prime-minister and his obvious “empathy” with the citizens, we will stop at the mysterious mister “Mr….”.

May we notice that on March 27 2004, “Mr. ...” - whose name does not appear in the transcript, being kept secret by the services that he belongs to - makes a revealing statement regarding Gregorian Bivolaru and the customs officer, Zsolt Farkas. The very next day, March 28 th 2004, the two are captured by (attention!) the Police, and charged with attempt of illegally crossing the state border.

This way the statement “is trying to get them out now” reveals its meaning. The police not only tries, but in this case it even succeeds.

There are relevant confessions of the eye witnesses proving that Gregorian Bivolaru and Zsolt Farkas were forcefully brought out and dragged on the border line (on the in-coming lane), where they were photographed in order to prove the alleged attempt.

Unfortunately these revelations end right with this transcript of March 27 th 2004 , otherwise who knows what else would come out…

There are also other arguments that prove undoubtedly that what happened at Nadlac border point was a set up.

The Romanian authorities, respectively the Nadlac Border Police, have decided the detention motivating they had caught Gregorian Bivolaru and Farkas Ferenc Zsolt in flagrant while trying to illegally cross the Romanian state border.

From the very first statements taken by customs police from both Bivolaru and Farkas, they both denied having been caught while walking “from the exit of the customs building and passing by the customs office towards the Hungarian border avoiding the check points, where the passports are checked in view of entering the country, at approximately 10-15 meters, without presenting themselves to the mentioned check point in order to hand in their passports for checking”, as it was recorded in the report no. 3727 on the 28 th of March 2004, file no. 1620/P/2004 of the Prosecutors' Office of Arad Court of Law. Both of them declared that the customs police detained them inside the customs office, where they went to find out whether the information that Gregorian Bivolaru had been confined to the border was true. Also, both declared that they were taken out of the customs office and filmed, in order to “prove” that they tried to commit the crime provided for in Article 70 of the Government Emergency Ordinance no. 105/2001. Their statements are contradicted by witness Doru Biris, the officer whom Bivolaru and Farkas asked to check whether Gregorian Bivolaru was confined to the border or not.

In his statement, the witness Doru Biris says that “due to a name confusion he informed him that the defendant Gregorian Bivolaru is confined to the border and cannot leave Romania”. The justification that he would have mistaken him with Gabriel Bivolaru, pursued for a 60 million dollars bank fraud, is unsustainable because Article 53 paragraph 1 of the Government Emergency Ordinance no. 105/2001 provides that the database contains the following information regarding the persons confined to the border:

a) name and surname, previous name, pseudonyms or nick-names; b) specific physical marks (eye colour, height…); c) the first letter of the middle name; d) date and place of birth; e) gender f) citizenship; g) whether the person in question is armed, according to the case; h) whether the person in question is violent, according to the case; i) the reason of the confinement; j) the measure to be taken.”

Considering that Doru Biris was handed in the passport of Gregorian Bivolaru in order to check whether the latter was consigned to the border or not, and considering also the amount of information available in the customs computer, the “confusion” cannot be considered but an intentional misleading, in the series of authorities' attempts to make up evidence against Gregorian Bivolaru at any cost.

And all this because in other circumstances Gregorian Bivolaru would have had absolutely no reason whatsoever to attempt to illegally cross the border, since no preventive measure was decided against him due to the lack of evidence. In other words he could have easily crossed the border without anybody raising any objection.

The proof that the authorities willingly generated a confusion in order to facilitate a set up is the statement given in a live intervention by the journalist Christian Levant on B1TV channel: ”that is why I say it is a diversion [...] because today in the press conference we were told that the penal prosecution against Gregorian Bivolaru had not started [...] but later on we called Mediafax and we asked, they told us the news [that Bivolaru is pursued at national level] was not true, but they were ordered to tell it [...] this is what they told both to me and to a colleague of mine”.

Related video:

Abuse and terror against Gregorian Bivolaru and MISA yoga school
(3 min. 41 sec.)
To watch this video directly in this page click on the play button; to watch it in a larger window click on the text title of the movie.

Copyright © 2005-2010 GregorianBivolaru.net, GregorianBivolaru.com, GregorianBivolaru.org